Skip to content

Vibration Sensitive 2

September 16, 2012

nauticalmiami

This portrait was taken while working during the summer 2012. I was building an immersive system informed by my interests in thoughtful interaction design, sensory motor coupling, augmented reality, and story telling using sensors, Processing, and Java; here I am game basing my sound art practice.

In the portrait I am questing resonant differences, with a microphone made with a suction cup, between the stars cast on the floor from a window in a room in my home. I live off the bay in Miami, FL and my home is elevated off a limestone ground. On gusty days, drones emerge; here I am roping the stars.

When I recently discovered that I had a major conflict in my schedule between my invitation as a guest artist to the 2012 International Symposium of Electronic Arts and a novel  game, simulation, animation, and media computation program I have been appointed to develop for Miami-Dade County Public Schools, and could not attend the 2012 ISEA to perform, I quickly turned the work I was doing this summer into an autonomous system. The thought was to turn the work I developed over the summer into spongiform for the site we would be performing at, the University of New Mexico’s Duck Pond, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA. If I could not be present to perform, I could have a computer on site, in my place, that would represent a psycogeographical mapping of my presence in my home, recontextualized as a multiplicity of versions for the pond. I thought this project would make for a unique alternative ecosystem to Duck Pond. It would contribute, to the Duck Pond environment, an alternative evolution and morphology; for example, alternative to that of a tadpole or mosquito in a pond. It would also contribute to the discourses that emerge in my processes re-envisioning art, technology, and nature.

However, after mulling over handing an autonomous self over to my colleagues, David Dunn and Gustavo Matamoros, I decided against handing the project over to anyone because I became attached to the work and felt I could not part with it. I need to be part of the system to close the loop, to feedback; otherwise, it would not be a work of art. In my art, I am tuning into intimacy and perspective. During the development of the project I was conscious of my own environment’s affect on my emotions, the behavior that emerged, and therefore the meaning that was produced. Cognizant of the seeding that occurs in my processes, I came to the conclusion that without my physiological and psychological presence in my system, sending a computer over to perform autonomously for me would equate to no more than having my colleagues press play on a sampler I engineered using computer science, to be subsumed by their contributions to the performance.

Rene Barge

 

Advertisements
No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: